Paper 2: Performing rapid reviews

Health policy-makers must often make decisions in compressed time frames and with limited resources. Hence, rapid reviews have become a pragmatic alternative to comprehensive systematic reviews. However, it is important that rapid review methods remain rigorous to support good policy development and decisions. There is currently little evidence about which streamlined steps in a rapid review are less likely to introduce unacceptable levels of uncertainty while still producing a product that remains useful to policy-makers.

a:1:{i:0;s:42:"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-022-02011-5";}

King, V.J., A. Stevens, B. Nussbaumer-Streit, C. Kamel, C. Garritty (2022) Paper 2: Performing rapid reviews. Syst Rev 11, 151. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-022-02011-5